Skip to main content

ANU Centre for European Studies

  • Home
  • About
  • People
    • Directors
    • Professional staff
    • Visiting Fellows
    • Past visitors
    • Associates
    • Students
      • Current PhD students
      • Past PhD students
      • Interns
  • Events
    • Event series
  • News
  • Highlights
  • Publications
    • Briefing Papers
    • Policy Notes
    • Centre Newsletters
    • Occasional Papers
    • Konrad Adenauer Lecture Papers
    • Working Papers
  • Jean Monnet activities
    • Algorithmic Futures Policy Lab
    • Culture in International Relations: Europe and the Indo-Pacific
    • EU Climate Change Agenda & External Trade and Investment
    • Implementing Climate Policies
    • Liberal Democracy in Action
    • Remembering Across Continents: European Politics of Memory from Australian Perspectives
    • EU Migration & Integration Network
    • Centre of Excellence for EU - Australia Economic Cooperation
    • Third Country Engagement with EU Trade Policy
    • EU - Australia Trade in Services
    • Energy Policy Workshop
    • Water Policy Innovation Hub
    • Europa Policy Labs
    • Understanding Geographical Indications
    • Understanding EU Trade: Stakeholder Training
    • Leadership Emerging from Migration Ethnicity Race and Gender in Australia and the EU
  • Past projects
  • Fellowships
  • Links
  • Contact us

Related Sites

  • Gifts and donations
  • Research School of Social Sciences

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomeNewsRegulatory Systems For Geographical Indications
Regulatory Systems for Geographical Indications
Thursday 18 March 2021

Photo by Sara Kurfeß on Unsplash

Author: Hazel V J Moir, ANU Centre for European Studies

This Policy Note is the part of the Third Country Engagement with EU Trade Policy (EUT+3) project co- funded by the Jean Monnet Erasmus+ Programme

Since the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 the European Union (EU) and the USA have fought over policy for Geographical Indications (GIs) in many forums. A major area of contention is whether GI provisions should be delivered through a sui generis (tailor made) registration system or through the trademarks system. In its negotiating texts for Australia and New Zealand the EU is demanding the adoption of a tailor-made GI registration system – one that mirrors the system developed to suit European countries. There is very little evidence of Australian demand for such a system. This Policy Note looks at key issues relevant to this proposal.

For more information, please see the linked document below. 

 

File attachments

AttachmentSize
ANUCES_Policy_Notes_issue_5_2020_Geographical_Indications.pdf(1.59 MB)1.59 MB